|
A STATEMENT FOLLOWING A MISSION TO EVALUATE THE CURRENT CRISIS IN ISRAEL AND THE PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES On the basis of the findings of its mission to Israel and the Palestinian Occupied Territories from 4-8 October, 2000, the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network (EMHRN), the International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH) and the International Committee of Jurists (ICJ)-Sweden strongly urge the international community:
the EU:
Israel:
Mission Members Mandate and
Activities In carrying this out they liaised closely with local EMHRN and FIDH members, together with other human rights and humanitarian organizations working throughout the affected areas of Northern Israel, East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The mission spoke to victims and families of people who died in violent clashes, together with eye witnesses who were able to provide first hand information about particular incidents. Site visits were also carried out to places of conflict including Netzarim Junction and Khan Younnis in Gaza, Nazareth, Arrabe and Umm el Fahm in Northern Israel and Beit Sahour and Ramallah in the West Bank. It conducted meetings with the local authorities, members of the medical services and management of the Red Crescent in addition to NGOs and political representatives who were able to provide an overall assessment of the situation. An itinerary and a summary of the interviews and meetings carried out by the mission will be made available shortly. The Observations Excessive and
Indiscriminate Use of Force Although there has been some limited use of firearms by Palestinians most violence has taken the form of stone throwing and (to a much lesser extent) the use of 'Molotov cocktails'. Despite the fact that where it was used tear gas proved to be an effective reaction to violent demonstrations leading to a quick and sustained dispersal its use has been very limited. Similarly, there has been no evidence of water cannons being used. Instead from a very early stage in the conflict Israeli authorities resorted to using a range of firearms and heavy weapons which have resulted in widespread death and injuries amongst the Palestinians. Such use has been wholly out of proportion to the threat faced as reflected in the casualty figures provided by the medical services and human rights organizations.(2) In addition to so-called ‘rubber’ bullets (thinly coated iron balls or cylinders which can be lethal when fired at close range) live ammunition has also been consistently used – including, according to medical expertise, illegal dum-dum and explosive bullets. Heavy weapons normally reserved only for military warfare have also been deployed including machine guns, 9.6 mm high velocity ammunition and LAW rockets fired from Apache helicopters(3). Unsurprisingly, these have resulted in serious injuries and loss of life when used against not just violent demonstrators, but also peaceful protests and local residents. Peaceful protesters have been attacked whilst lying on the ground after being overpowered by Israeli security forces(4). In one case in Arrabe, Northern Israel, execution of an unarmed protester by a single shot to the neck after being pursued and overpowered by two security personnel has been reported. Lethal Use of Force Often Targeting Innocent Civilians and Children Private houses and civilians have been attacked indiscriminately particularly at night(5). As reported, such attacks have involved the use of snipers with high velocity weapons. This is despite the fact that no demonstrations have been taking place within the vicinity. The increasing involvement of settlers in such attacks also gives cause for concern. The majority of Palestinian casualties have received injuries to the upper part of their body with the apparent intention of inflicting the maximum harm. This includes a high number of eye injuries often sustained through the firing of ‘rubber’ bullets at close range. The result is not just the loss of an eye, but often severe brain damage or death. Several of these cases involve children. Indeed, the number of children casualties in the current conflict is disturbingly high (22 killed by 10 October). There appears to be no attempt to distinguish between them and adults and to afford them special protection in accordance with Israel’s commitments under both the Fourth Geneva Convention and the Convention of the Rights of the Child. Attacks on and Intimidation
of Medical Personnel In addition there is evidence of deliberate hindrance of the work of medical personnel thereby endangering the lives of they are seeking to help. In some instances this has resulted in delays of hours before ambulances have been able to transfer the wounded to hospitals. Impunity and Lack of
Due Process Initial Conclusions
of the Mission
Political Analysis According to the information gathered, it is clear that the present conflict stems from an impasse in the peace process and the increased sufferings the Palestinians since the Oslo Peace Accords. The Oslo Peace Accords incorporate two aspects : (1) confidence building measures and (2) a final settlement intended to be reached by May 1999. However, not only has a final settlement not been reached, but to date only extremely limited results have been reached in the realm of confidence building. On the contrary the status quo which resulted from the Oslo Agreement and the Washington negotiations have increased and cemented mutual distrust by inventing and empowering a system of social and economic inequality combined with an overt military threat. The seeds of conflict have been sown in the structural economic, social and cultural rights violations that continue to be perpetrated against the Palestinians as well as a denial of basic civil liberties such as freedom of movement and right to fair trial. The continued confiscation of land and building of settlements in the Occupied Territories is a constant reminder that the Palestinians are not truly free in their own land, but victims of a form of apartheid. For example in the Gaza Strip - scene of the some of the worst violence - 20 Israeli settlements with a population of 6,000 control 42% of the land leaving the remaining 58% to 1.2 million Palestinians. The result has been to create a deep-rooted distrust and disillusion on the Palestinian side of their Israeli neighbors. The unjustified provocation by Ariel Sharon’s "visit" to the Haram Al-Sharif, accompanied by a huge number of Israeli security forces, was merely the trigger needed to unleash this frustration and anger. Thus with nearly ninety people killed and thousands injured it seems that there is a great risk that the situation will deteriorate seriously unless Israeli policies are drastically changed towards ending its belligerent occupation of the last thirty three years and recognizing the rights of the Palestinian people to be empowered through genuine self-determination and the independence for a Palestinian State. Endnotes: (1) The mission took testimony from victims, their families and eye witnesses in East Jerusalem, Ramallah, Beit Sahour, Nazareth, Arrebe, Umm el Fahm and the Gaza Strip (2) The latest figures place the Palestinian death toll at close to 100 and injuries over 2,500 compared to Israeli losses which are in single figures (3) The mission saw a 12 year old child victim in Shifa Hospital, Gaza of a rocket attack resulting in a loss of both eyes and arms (4) This included two women in Nazareth one of whom was hit in the lower abdomen with a rifle butt (5) The mission saw evidence of this in houses in Beit Sahour which have been fired on randomly at night by an Israeli military camp over 1 kilometer away (6) Figures received up until the 5th October indicated 17 Red Crescent Ambulances had been fired on, one medic killed and six others injured while trying to save Mohammed Al Durreh. Figures given by the Director General of the Red Crescent, Ramallah. |